I have a pulled together a dataset of unemployment rates since 1991 for Chicago and its surrounding county, metro area, state and region. The really striking thing is the convergance of the city and its surrounding areas. The unemployment rate at all levels have moved up and down largely based on cyclical factors. However, throughout the period the City of Chicago has crept closer to the other areas.
Back in 1991, Chicago was struggling 9.9% unemployment, Cook County was substantially better at 8.2% . The Greater Chicago Metro area and the State of Illinois were facing comparatively tame unemployment in the low 7% range.
Fast Forward 18 years to 2009, amid a far worse downturn, Chicago’s rate has jumped to 10.9%. However, the surrounding areas have detiriorated far more. Cook County is just .6% less at 10.3% and both the state and the metro area are within 1 percentage point. The narrowing of this gap is not a temporary one off result. There has been a steady and persistant decline in this difference.
I don’t know if this is the result of demographic changes, the national trend of urban revival, smart policies or some other factor. This stands as a significant achievment of our dear leaders administration.



As the comparison shows, only Atlanta and Houston have lower rental costs than Chicago among America’s top global cities. However, I would argue that these cities offer a fundamentally different appeal. Primarily car based, these cities have much lower densities and lack the same urban amenities that attract people to Chicago.